| Alan
Thornhill - Thoughts on the Aesthetic Experience and On Creativity
Techniques
The most important techniques are those devised by the individual for dealing
with self consciousness, dominant intentionality, insidious predisposition
toward the familiar and the nameable, fear of failure, dependence on achieving
acceptable results, all of which undermine and debilitate the process.
Originality
Originality consists in authenticity; is work which originates from inside the
maker, an insistent prompting to express through or interplay with material. The
widespread and spurious demand that art should be above all innovative tends to
cerebration and galvanises the ego of the intending innovator. But
are mind and ego the prime sources of creativity?
Materials
Questioning the nature of the activity itself, (e.g. sculpture) - an important
part of the work process - can lose force where there is a multiplicity of
materials in play. Inquiry is possibly more rigorous and productive within the
constraints of a single material. The work is a reflection, shared
with the viewer, of this process of inquiry - an act of faith and instinct
rather than of specific intention; creating openings and advancing boldly into
them free of the dominance of intellect or habit.
The
so-called aesthetic experience
Art at its best acts as nourishment - the challenging reclamation and
re-stimulation of our dormant faculties, the catalyst of surprise and discovery. It
strengthens our sense of possibility and broadens our horizons. Warmth is
its vital quality because it is involving. Without involvement there can be
no affect and without affect the aesthetic experience is pallid and incomplete. The
immediacy of our involuntary sensuous response provides an opening for all that
follows; this must precede and overpower, indeed obliterate for the moment our
shallower cerebral faculties of recognition, categorisation, analysis and
self-congratulation.
Content
At the present stage of the evolution of human consciousness neither
illustration nor literal description or juxtaposing arrangement can provide us
with what precisely is meant by 'content' in a work of art. These modes leave
the observer a mere onlooker. They do not galvanise us to a fully
alerted presence; they sell us short, leave us indifferent or
disappointed. Content is that phenomenon of communication in which
the awareness of the observer senses and picks up signals of presence and action
issuing from another consciousness, that have been embedded without
self-regard in a chosen material. This is what we need from art. Where content
thus described is absent there can be little or no communication at a deep
level, no profound effect. As it becomes habitual the resulting
disappointment tends to dehumanise us, lowering our expectation and reducing our
openness to experience. It is in this subtle way that 'content' in a work
of art can promote cohesion and sensitivity amongst humans, prompting a shared
openness to possibilities of communication, wonder and insight. This
is the sense in which art can be affirming. It requires a work
process that takes us beyond ego and leads to the discovery and supports the
presence of undifferentiated formal elements. Often through their
very ambiguity, these elements can key us into the circuitry of our Collective
Unconscious. Receiving the twinge we pass on perplexed maybe, but
somehow nourished at the root.
"Yes,
but what is it?"
That very question presumes the fallacy that sculpture has to be preconceived,
that it necessarily embodies purpose and subject matter from the outset. This
disregard, indeed denial of the improvisatory and exploratory spirit, has as its
counterpart the tyrannous indeed fatuous emphasis on 'innovation' -- the
excesses of which are now seen by many to be sterile and played out. The
view that by a tradition long preceding the Renaissance, sculpture is an
activity which concerns itself primarily with Mass, with its ordering in space
as Form so that it communicates with the viewer in its own terms, is valid,
honourable and worth sustaining. This formal ordering can become a
comprehensive and singular Presence rather than a descriptive retailing of
subject matter. It is by its mysteriously engaging formal quality
that sculpture at its best can arrest us, alert our awareness and make a
significant, possibly enduring contribution at a profound level to our
experience.
Alan Thornhill, Stroud 2008 |